Apologies to our email subscribers, as over the past week or so new posts on PT have not been pushed out via email. Though you may not have received e-mails, we have been posting. For those of you who may have missed our posts here is a snapshot.
We ran the second piece in a two-part series on the relationship of the Tax Court and the APA by guest bloggers Professors Stephanie Hoffer and Christopher Walker; Keith posted on the IRS’s power to assess and collect on restitution payments, Les posted on the oral argument in Clarke v US (the summons enforcement case that is before the Supreme Court), and a Summary Opinion post highlights some of the last week’s developments.
The technical problems are under control and email subscribers should now be receiving regular emails when we post.
About Stephen Olsen
Comment Policy: While we all have years of experience as practitioners and attorneys, and while Keith and Les have taught for many years, we think our work is better when we generate input from others. That is one of the reasons we solicit guest posts (and also because of the time it takes to write what we think are high quality posts). Involvement from others makes our site better. That is why we have kept our site open to comments.
If you want to make a public comment, you must identify yourself (using your first and last name) and register by including your email. If you do not, we will remove your comment. In a comment, if you disagree with or intend to criticize someone (such as the poster, another commenter, a party or counsel in a case), you must do so in a respectful manner. We reserve the right to delete comments. If your comment is obnoxious, mean-spirited or violates our sense of decency we will remove the comment. While you have the right to say what you want, you do not have the right to say what you want on our blog.