DAWSON Continues to Evolve

0 Flares Filament.io 0 Flares ×

In a press release earlier this week, the Tax Court announced new features had been added to DAWSON. Since its introduction over a year ago, the Court has stated that the initial rollout in December 2020 was a first step and not the last step. This announcement discusses new features coming online. The announcement is copied in its entirety below.

The new announcement also disappoints with the statement that the Tax Court will continue to make only the documents its generates, i.e., orders and opinions, publicly available online.  In denying access to all other documents, the Tax Court continues to be inconsistent with other federal courts. While Tax Court cases implicate sensitive taxpayer information, other courts (such as bankruptcy courts) balance those concerns with public access and greater transparency of court functions. Moreover, the Tax Court fails to explain the privacy concerns it protects in the entity cases filed with the Court nor address the methods that could be used to publish information regarding individuals while protecting their privacy.


For prior discussions of this issue see the discussions here and here which include a link to a larger article on this issue published in Tax Notes.  The Tax Notes article makes a number of suggestions that would allow the Court to publish documents without raising significant privacy concerns.  It also discusses how the Court’s reasoning for not publishing documents has no applicability to the cases filed by entities even if it uniquely provides a basis for hiding the information regarding individuals.  Other courts have done this balancing of privacy versus the public nature of court information and come out on the other side.

Early in the Tax Court’s discussion of DAWSON the court had signaled the possibility that the enhanced features made available through DAWSON would cause a rethinking of its position to deny electronic access to all documents generated by parties other than the Court.  The new announcement does nothing to reveal its thinking on why it continues to deny this information electronically.  Going into the Court to look at documents, for those fortunate enough to have that option, has been unavailable for almost two years meaning any effort to see documents in this Court requires paying for the privilege.

Washington, D.C. 20217
February 1, 2022


On December 28, 2020, the Court discontinued the use of its decades-old legacy case management system and began phasing in DAWSON (Docket Access Within A Secure Online Network), a new case-management system designed to help litigants and the Court manage active cases more efficiently and with greater transparency. DAWSON allowed, for the first time, the electronic filing of petitions with the Tax Court. Over 750 new features have been added since December 28, 2020, such as the ability to view Today’s Orders and Today’s Opinions, and the ability to search the Court’s opinions and orders. Features were also added to accommodate remote proceedings, unforeseen when DAWSON development began, but vital to the Court’s continued operations.

The Court now displays all bench opinions on its Today’s Opinions page. The Court also now publicly releases all orders in non-sealed cases, providing the ability to sort by page count or time of release. The ability to view unsealed documents in cases where some, but not all, documents have been sealed will be implemented in the coming months. After that, the next major feature will be consolidated case functionality.

The Court will continue to safeguard taxpayer privacy and will maintain limits to online access to case records other than Court-issued documents (i.e., opinions and orders).

DAWSON Release Notes detailing enhancements and new features can be found on the Court’s website at https://ustaxcourt.gov/dawson.html, along with User Guides and detailed instructions on how to use the system to file and manage a case.


  1. Sandra Mertens says

    In my opinion and experience, the “decades old legacy case management system” was great, especially when compared to other systems. Here in Cook County, Illinois (covering Chicago and nearby suburbs), the Court Clerk’s website and docket system has been down for most of the past year, and although they have been ordered with all other Illinois counties to develop online access to court files, Cook County has never successfully implemented it and even now you must go in person to the Court and pull the file. All Illinois counties have been mandatorily forced to participate in the new Odyssey-based e-filing system, which is still inferior to the Tax Court’s legacy e-filing system. DAWSON may have additional securities and capabilities, but so far it has disappointed in many ways. Viewing “Today’s Orders and Opinions” is inferior to the old system which allowed you to view all recent opinions in date order and search by date or keyword. If you don’t view the “Today’s Orders” page every single day, you must go through many extra steps to find them. DAWSON’s e-filing is also not user-friendly or intuitive despite the instructions and guides, which impinges on taxpayer access to justice for pro se cases. I hope the Tax Court continues to make improvements to DAWSON to develop it into the helpful case management system the “legacy” one used to be.

  2. Robert Nassau says

    Presumably Congress could pass a law mandating freer access to Tax Court documents. Perhaps that’s the route this needs to go since the Tax Court sure doesn’t seem inclined to do the right thing.

  3. U.S. Tax Court Systems are experiencing Internal brokenness so certain tax evasion cases into key foundations owned by key individuals are slowing if not completely impeding proper investigations.

Comment Policy: While we all have years of experience as practitioners and attorneys, and while Keith and Les have taught for many years, we think our work is better when we generate input from others. That is one of the reasons we solicit guest posts (and also because of the time it takes to write what we think are high quality posts). Involvement from others makes our site better. That is why we have kept our site open to comments.

If you want to make a public comment, you must identify yourself (using your first and last name) and register by including your email. If you do not, we will remove your comment. In a comment, if you disagree with or intend to criticize someone (such as the poster, another commenter, a party or counsel in a case), you must do so in a respectful manner. We reserve the right to delete comments. If your comment is obnoxious, mean-spirited or violates our sense of decency we will remove the comment. While you have the right to say what you want, you do not have the right to say what you want on our blog.

Speak Your Mind