As was well documented today, the DC Circuit in Halbig v. Burwell and the Fourth Circuit in King v. Burwell issued conflicting opinions this morning on the IRS regulations authorizing tax credits in federal exchanges under section 36B of the ACA. The DC Circuit held the regulations were invalid and only state exchanges could receive the credits, while the Fourth Circuit said the Service had a reasonable interpretation of the ambiguous statute and subsidies were available for folks who signed up through the federal exchange.
Les covered both of these case before, when each was in the lower court. The Halbig write up can be found here, and the King write up can be found here. We will have some in depth coverage and thoughts on the holdings later this week. Stay tuned!
Although I indicate in my title, this is heading to the Supreme Court, it is possible that en banc review will be requested, putting off what I suspect is the inevitable hard look from John Roberts and Co.
Comment Policy: While we all have years of experience as practitioners and attorneys, and while Keith and Les have taught for many years, we think our work is better when we generate input from others. That is one of the reasons we solicit guest posts (and also because of the time it takes to write what we think are high quality posts). Involvement from others makes our site better. That is why we have kept our site open to comments.
If you want to make a public comment, you must identify yourself (using your first and last name) and register by including your email. If you do not, we will remove your comment. In a comment, if you disagree with or intend to criticize someone (such as the poster, another commenter, a party or counsel in a case), you must do so in a respectful manner. We reserve the right to delete comments. If your comment is obnoxious, mean-spirited or violates our sense of decency we will remove the comment. While you have the right to say what you want, you do not have the right to say what you want on our blog.