Unfinished Business in Senate: Time to Approve Nominated Tax Court Judges

0 Flares Filament.io 0 Flares ×

Below is a guest post by Professor Danshera Cords, a Professor of Law at Albany Law School who is visiting this year at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. While there has been a great deal of attention on the Supreme Court vacancy, as the Washington Post reported earlier this year there are many federal judges in limbo awaiting Senate confirmation. Professor Cords reminds us that one byproduct of the partisan divide has been significant delays in the approval of nominated Tax Court judges.  Les

The Senate has pending before it two qualified nominees for the U.S. Tax Court.  These nominees have been fully vetted; in April, hearings were conducted by the Senate Finance Committee. The Finance Committee unanimously voted to send these nominees to the full Senate for approval. Nomination and confirmation of U.S. Tax Court judges has traditionally been a nonpartisan practice and should continue in that manner. Failure to confirm these two nominees before the recess of the 114th Congress will result in a waste of taxpayer resources to identify and vet these extremely well-qualified candidates. It will also cause hardship to taxpayers whose cases accrue interest while their cases are left to linger while new candidates are identified and vetted after the new administration works through its priority nominations. More than 50 tax law professors, academics, and clinicians have signed this letter urging the Senate to immediately schedule a vote on these two nominees.

UPDATE: Our friends over at the Surly Subgroup have also posted on this here


  1. Not so fast…

    • Jeanne Tatum says

      “More than 50 tax law professors, academics, and clinicians have signed this letter urging the Senate to immediately schedule a vote on these two nominees.” I agree with Seth, let’s take a breath and regroup on this one. If the 50 people urging the vote were practitioners in the field, it would carry a little more credence for me than 50 academics.

Comment Policy: While we all have years of experience as practitioners and attorneys, and while Keith and Les have taught for many years, we think our work is better when we generate input from others. That is one of the reasons we solicit guest posts (and also because of the time it takes to write what we think are high quality posts). Involvement from others makes our site better. That is why we have kept our site open to comments.

If you want to make a public comment, you must identify yourself (using your first and last name) and register by including your email. If you do not, we will remove your comment. In a comment, if you disagree with or intend to criticize someone (such as the poster, another commenter, a party or counsel in a case), you must do so in a respectful manner. We reserve the right to delete comments. If your comment is obnoxious, mean-spirited or violates our sense of decency we will remove the comment. While you have the right to say what you want, you do not have the right to say what you want on our blog.

Speak Your Mind